What is the effect of a decision by a panel of the 9th Circuit of Justice denying habeas relief for ineffective assistance of counsel at trial and at sentencing?

A three-judge panel of this court unanimously affirmed the denial of habeas relief for ineffective assistance of counsel at trial, but, over a dissent, reversed the denial of habeas relief for ineffective assistance of counsel at sentencing. Mann v. Ryan , 774 F.3d 1203 (9th Cir. 2014). A majority of the nonrecused active judges on our court subsequently voted to rehear the case en banc. Mann v. Ryan , 797 F.3d 654 (9th Cir. 2015) (mem.). We affirm the district court's denial of habeas relief on the ineffective assistance of counsel claims at both trial and sentencing.