The following excerpt is from Brice v. Cal. Faculty Ass'n, No. 2:18-cv-03106-MCE-EFB (E.D. Cal. 2019):
(1) the plaintiff's choice of forum; (2) the respective parties' contacts with the forum; (3) contacts relating to the plaintiff's cause of action in the forum; (4) the cost of litigation in either forum; (5) the ease of access to sources of proof; (6) the availability of compulsory process to compel attendance of unwilling non-party witnesses; and (7) other facts that, in the interest of justice, impact the convenience or fairness of a particular venue. See Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc., 211 F.3d 495, 498-99 (9th Cir. 2000).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.