The following excerpt is from Freshko Produce Servs. v. ILA Prods., Inc., Case No.: 1:19-cv-00017-DAD-BAM (E.D. Cal. 2020):
(3) the sufficiency of the complaint; (4) the sum of money at stake in the action; (5) the possibility of a dispute concerning material facts; (6) whether the default was due to excusable neglect; and (7) the strong policy of favoring decision on the merits. Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1471-72 (9th Cir.1986).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.