The following excerpt is from Abbas-Hasanie et al. v. Regina (City) and Alvord, Burdick & Howson et al. (No. 1), 1990 CanLII 7464 (SK QB):
The time that has elapsed in the present case has not extended beyond any applicable limitation period. Lord Diplock said in Birkett v. James, [1977] 2 All E.R. 801, at p. 808: "... [T]ime elapsed before the issue of a writ within the limitation period cannot of itself constitute inordinate delay however much the defendant may already have been prejudiced by the consequent lack of early notice of the claim against him. ..."
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.