Likewise, the decision in Lasby v. Everall Engineering Ltd. (1960), 1960 CanLII 179 (SK QB), 32 W.W.R.(N.S.) 335, relied upon by the plaintiff, is not very helpful. The court ruled that “damages occasioned by a motor vehicle”, did not cover damages occasioned to a motor vehicle, so the limitation period was inapplicable. There, the plaintiff’s automobile was damaged when it struck some rocks on a road which was being repaired by the defendant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.