It should be noted that the point to be looked for is whether the damages were occasioned, meaning in my view, were caused by or were brought about by, a vehicle. In the present case as in the Biggs v. Baker case, the damages were done to the vehicle, not occasioned by it. Hence I find the answer to the question submitted is “no”. That is, the present action is not one “for the recovery of damages occasioned by a motor vehicle”. Order accordingly.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.