What is the test for foreseeability in tort law?
New Brunswick, Canada
The following excerpt is from Octa Evergreens Ltd. v. New Brunswick (Province of), 2002 NBQB 195 (CanLII):
Donoghue v. Stevenson established the principle that the law does require foreseeability for negligent conduct and tort law is not an insurer for all injuries or losses.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What factors are considered by the Court in determining notice of a claim? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for "intentionally" disentitled to be considered to be a contributory factor in determining whether a payer intentionally avoided paying child support obligations? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Is there a net run against a party out of possession? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for the relevance of a question at an Examination for Discovery? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the case law on the basis of a mother’s argument that a child is entitled to a reduction in the amount of child support if she stops working? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the legal test for making a material alteration to an instrument? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the law of conflicts of interest for a solicitor in a personal injury case? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the difference between a traffic light and a traffic stop? (New Brunswick, Canada)
Are stock options that are not exercisable by the end of the marriage marital property? (New Brunswick, Canada)
What is the test for a preliminary motion for habeas corpus? (New Brunswick, Canada)
