I turn to the factor of “notice”, which concerns itself with “the reasons for any delay” by the other spouse in seeking appropriate support. The concern is to place “proper incentives on the applicant to proceed with his or her claims promptly”, in this case the wife. What is to be avoided is uncertainty in legal obligations: “the possibility of an order that reaches back into the past makes it more difficult to plan one’s affairs and a sizeable “retroactive” award for which the payor did not plan may impose financial hardship” (Kerr v. Baranow, ibid, at para. 209).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.