In New Brunswick at least, the definition of “intentionally” found in the above provision broadly captures the concept of “reasonableness” (See: D.L.M v. J.A.M. 2008 NBCA 2). In other words, apart from any evidence that a payer was deliberately under or unemployed so as to avoid support obligations, the question is also whether it was reasonable in all the circumstances for the payer to have only earned the sums reported, i.e. did he reasonably maximize his earning capacity? (See: e.g. Arbou v. Robichaud, supra).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.