There is no direct evidence of what the salary would have been but for the stigma created by the employer. I conclude that as in Cook v. Lewis, 1951 CanLII 26 (SCC), [1951] S.C.R. 830 (S.C.C.), the plaintiff cannot be expected to adduce such evidence because the employer’s misconduct has made it practically impossible for the plaintiff to obtain such information. The salary was fixed in a context where the new employer was faced with the defendant’s false allegations. Further, it is unlikely that those who fixed the salary would be willing to discuss how that information affected their decision.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.