In rejecting this submission, I respectfully adopt the reasons of Shaw J. in Engum v. The Queen, supra, commencing at para. 69. As in that case, there is nothing that would require the authorizing judge to provide notice of a hearing to the petitioner. (b) Does s. 487.055 violate ss. 7, 8, and 11(i) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms? 1. Sections 8 and 11(i)
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.