The petitioner argues that the Adjudicator’s failure to consider the video evidence deprived the petitioner of his right to make full answer and defence as guaranteed by s. 7 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I disagree. As noted by the respondent, an IRP does not engage s. 7 of the Charter: Buhlers v. British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 1999 BCCA 114 at paras. 109-110, leave to appeal ref’d [2000] 1 S.C.R. viii.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.