The Attorney-General contended that s. 94(2) which deals with a public welfare offence, was consistent with the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. This submission was based on the proposition that the interpretation to be given to the phrase "the principles of fundamental justice" in s. 7 of the Charter was governed by decisions based upon the interpretation of the Canadian Bill of Rights. In this context reference was made to the decision in Curr v. The Queen (1972), 1972 CanLII 15 (SCC), 7 C.C.C. (2d) 181, 26 D.L.R. (3d) 603, [1972] S.C.R. 889, and to the judgments of Laskin J. (as he then was) and of Ritchie J.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.