It is not enough that the public officer knew that he or she was doing or omitting to do something which he or she was obligated to do as a public officer. The plaintiff must prove that when doing so, the public officer knew that harm to the plaintiff was a likely consequence of the misconduct. It is insufficient to plead that the defendant “knew or should have known”: Odhavji Estate v. Woodhouse, supra, at para 38.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.