What is the test for a proposal that falls within the range of general deterrence, rehabilitation, denunciation and denunciation?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Harding (Re), 2016 LSBC 9 (CanLII):

Our main focus in determining whether the proposal falls within this range must be on the protection of the public interest and the need to maintain the public’s confidence in the legal profession. These overarching principles are promoted by a number of subsidiary principles, including the need for specific and general deterrence, rehabilitation, punishment and denunciation (Law Society of BC v. Ogilvie, 1999 LSBC 17, paras. 9-10).

Other Questions


Does the general principle allow recovery in cases not falling within the traditional categories of recovery? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a jury’s appreciation of pain, suffering and loss of amenities wrong if the award does not fall within the range of awards for non-pecuniary damages? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for adding plaintiffs to a proposed class action where the named and proposed representative plaintiff has no legitimate cause of action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a disciplinary action acceptable if it is within the range of fair and reasonable disciplinary action? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the authority for reducing spousal support awards within the appropriate range of awards? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of general damages for loss of housekeeping capacity? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of general damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can the defence argue that the documents sought in this application fall within Rule 7-1(1)(a)(i)? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for denunciation and deterrence in cases of assault by a peace officer? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for failing to undergo recommended injections and not participating fully in active rehabilitation? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.