Non-pecuniary awards are inherently arbitrary and, because of this, the jury members’ subjective appreciation of the plaintiff’s pain, suffering and loss of amenities is not necessarily wrong if the award does not fall into the range of awards that have been made by trial judges in similar cases. As Mr. Justice Smith noted in Boyd v. Harris, supra:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.