The trial judge had included the pre-trial loss of housekeeping capacity in his award for general damages, following the principles set down in Daly. The Court of Appeal criticized him (at 400) for not having segregated the “various components of pecuniary damages” as required by Andrews v. Grand & Toy Alberta Ltd., supra, so that it might conduct a meaningful review of the appropriateness of his award for the loss of housekeeping capacity.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.