However, McLachlin J. explained at 789 that the general principle permitted recovery in cases not falling within the traditional categories: … [T]he traditional categories of recovery, while instructive, are not the final determinants of whether a claim lies. In most cases, the traditional categories of recovery can be reconciled with the general principles enunciated in Pettkus v. Becker, supra. But new situations can arise which do not fit into an established category of recovery but nevertheless merit recognition on the basis of the general rule.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.