In any event, I consider that the unexplained lengthy gap between this allegation, and the timely allegations against UBC of discrimination because of disability (including a failure to accommodate), preclude a finding of an allegation of a continuing contravention, and militate against a finding that there is a public interest in allowing this aspect to proceed. See, generally: Stykel v. British Columbia (Ministry of Attorney General – Sheriff Services) and others, 2011 BCHRT 87.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.