Can a party that pays a sum they are not otherwise obligated to pay because of a "practical compulsion" recover that money under the doctrine of money had and received?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Barafield Realty Ltd. v. Just Energy (B.C.) Limited Partnership, 2016 BCSC 1303 (CanLII):
A party that pays a sum they are not otherwise obligated to pay because of a “practical compulsion” can recover that money under the doctrine of money had and received (Eadie v. Brantford (Township), 1967 CanLII 13 (SCC), [1967] S.C.R. 573 at 581).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a party recover in restitution where another party has been unjustly enriched at that party's expense? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will a defendant be liable for the entire amount of money he received in a transaction with a third party in which he is not liable? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the effect of the intention or understanding of a party to a transaction where a party intended to transfer a vehicle to another party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does the law of agency apply when one party gives explicit or implicit authority to another party (the principal) to enter contracts with third parties? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a successful party have the right to claim special costs when the successful party is in a relationship with an opposing party? (British Columbia, Canada)
On a value survived approach, is a party entitled to claim the value of services and other benefits received by the enriched party? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the legal test for a successful party to recover costs from the successful party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party recover additional expert opinions from a third party? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a party have an obligation to ensure that the signing party reads and understands the terms of a document? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a party who is not otherwise entitled to costs still recover costs if their offer to settle is better than the result of the trial? (British Columbia, Canada)
