Can a defendant review some factual findings made by the trial judge?

Manitoba, Canada


The following excerpt is from Northwood v. Bristol Aerospace Ltd., 2004 MBCA 162 (CanLII):

3 The defendant argued that this court was in a position to review some of the factual findings made by the trial judge because the evidence before him was more in the nature of an agreed statement of facts. I am not inclined to do so based on the principles set out in Housen v. Nikolaisen, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 2002 SCC 33.

Other Questions


What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and the inferences drawn by her? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review for a trial judge's findings of fact and any inferences drawn? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of appellate review applicable to all factual conclusions of a trial judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a defendant who called the victim a liar, gesticulate with his hands and gesticulated with his fingers, but the trial judge did not find that he grabbed the other's coat lapel or clenched his fist? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the authority of the trial judge to order a retroactive order from the interim judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
Can a judge review a finding of mixed fact and law in respect of the reasonable and probable grounds for the demand for breath samples? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a motion judge's decision not to interfere with the decision of the motion judge? (Manitoba, Canada)
What factors will be considered to support a finding of special circumstances in a motion to add a defendant to the list of defendants? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the test for a finding that marihuana would have been discovered and what is the legal test for that finding? (Manitoba, Canada)
What is the standard of deference the court owes to a motion judge in reviewing an order of support? (Manitoba, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.