In making the determinations the trial judge made in respect of the reasonable and probable grounds for the demand for breath samples, the trial judge was making a finding of mixed fact and law. Such questions of mixed fact and law are reviewed only for palpable and overriding error, unless an extricable or severable legal error from the factual determination is evident, in which case deference is not owed and the correctness standard can be used. See Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235, 211 D.L.R. (4th) 577.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.