Is a decision by a tribunal unreasonable if there is no line of analysis that could reasonably lead from the evidence before it to the conclusion?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Haché v. Lunenburg Co. District School Board, 2004 NSCA 46 (CanLII):

A decision is unreasonable if there is no line of analysis within the tribunal’s reasons that could reasonably lead from the evidence before it to the conclusion. This does mean that every element of the reasoning must independently pass a test for reasonableness. The question is whether the reasons, taken as a whole, are tenable as support for the decision: see Law Society of New Brunswick v. Ryan, supra at paras. 55 - 56

Other Questions


What is the reasonableness standard for making a decision at an administrative tribunal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for judicial deference in determining whether a statutory interpretation is reasonable or unreasonable under reasonableness review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard of evidence used in medical, scientific and other medical evidence at a jury trial? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a review court to determine whether a tribunal’s decision is justified, transparent and intelligible? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for adding affidavit evidence to the record of a decision-maker in a judicial review? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
In what circumstances have courts imputed income to a payor who provides no medical evidence to support the payor's claim of not being able to work for health reasons? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any difference between a written decision and written decision on interest and costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a decision to reopen a hearing to consider or present further evidence a matter of procedure and practice? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the standard of reasonable doubt apply to a piece of evidence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of a statutory tribunal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.