It is now trite law that as a general proposition the standard of reasonable doubt does not apply to individual pieces of evidence (see Morin v. R. (1988), 1988 CanLII 8 (SCC), 44 C.C.C. (3d) 193 (S.C.C.); [1988] 2 S.C.R. 345). But of course, if facts essential to a finding of guilt are still doubtful, this should produce a doubt in the mind of the trier of fact that guilt has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.