What is the reasonableness standard for making a decision at an administrative tribunal?

Nova Scotia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Halifax (Regional Municipality) v. Canadian Union of Public Employees, Local 108, 2010 NSSC 234 (CanLII):

Guidance with regard to the questions that will be reviewed on a reasonableness standard can be found in the existing case law. Deference will usually result where a tribunal is interpreting its own statute or statutes closely connected to its function, with which it will have particular familiarity.... Deference may also be warranted where an administrative tribunal has developed particular expertise in the application of a general common law or civil law rule in relation to a specific statutory context.... Adjudication in labour law remains a good example of the relevance of this approach. The case law has moved away considerably from the strict position evidenced in McLeod v. Egan, 1974 CanLII 12 (S.C.C.), [1975] 1 S.C.R. 517, where it was held that an administrative decision maker will always risk having its interpretation of an external statute set aside upon judicial review.

Other Questions


What is the reasonableness standard for an administrative tribunal's interpretation of a statute by its own statute? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is a decision by a tribunal unreasonable if there is no line of analysis that could reasonably lead from the evidence before it to the conclusion? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard of review of a decision of a statutory tribunal? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Can a decision about extending time for a human rights complaint be reviewed for reasonableness? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does the standard of reasonable doubt apply to a piece of evidence? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Does retaliation not have to be the only reason for an employer's decision to dismiss a human rights complaint? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the standard for reasonableness in the context of a claim for damages under section 100 of the NSSC 100? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
Is there any difference between a written decision and written decision on interest and costs? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What are the implications of a deferential standard of review for a factual or mixed fact and law decision? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
What is the test for a review court to determine whether a tribunal’s decision is justified, transparent and intelligible? (Nova Scotia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.