What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a personal injury action?

British Columbia, Canada


The following excerpt is from Sachdeva v Cheng, 2018 BCSC 1388 (CanLII):

A plaintiff must establish the existence of damages and quantum. However, the "burden of proof moves to the defendant if he alleges that the plaintiff could have and should have mitigated his loss": Hargreaves, at para. 2, referencing Janiak v. Ippolito, 1985 CanLII 62 (SCC), [1985] 1 S.C.R. 146 at 162.

Other Questions


If historical driving records are relevant in personal injury actions, would they be relevant in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Can a plaintiff in a personal injury action commence an action against a defendant in the same action against the same defendant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of mitigation for a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
Does a plaintiff have to satisfy the burden of proof in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, what is the current state of the law on pain? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a party to a personal injury action entitled to production of a party’s personal injury report? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff entitled to represent himself personally in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.