Does a plaintiff have to satisfy the burden of proof in a personal injury case?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Morales v. Neilsen, 2009 BCSC 1890 (CanLII):
He also notes at para. 39 that, as stated by McEachern C.J.S.C. in Butler v. Blaylock, the plaintiff may satisfy the burden of proof on him just by his own evidence if the surrounding circumstances are consistent with that evidence.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In a personal injury action for damages for personal injury, is there any case law where there is little or no objective evidence of continuing injury? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for establishing a claim for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the range of damages for personal injury damages in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for calculating damages for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the quantum of damages for personal injury awarded in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the burden of proof for a plaintiff in a personal injury action? (British Columbia, Canada)
In a personal injury action, can a plaintiff recover large amounts of personal injury damages from a vocational consultant? (British Columbia, Canada)
Is a plaintiff’s personal injury fund available for use in a personal injury litigation deduction? (British Columbia, Canada)
In what circumstances will the BC Supreme Court of Canada consider a motion for personal injury in a personal injury case? (British Columbia, Canada)
