The award for pain, suffering and loss of amenities was a little below some other reported cases, but not dramatically, and certainly not by a multiple. It is not right outside a proper range, and clearly does not meet the classic English appellate test of “so inordinately low . . . that it must be a wholly erroneous estimate of the damage.” See the authorities in Nance v. B.C. Elec. Ry. 1951 CanLII 374 (UK JCPC), [1951] A.C. 601, 613 (P.C.(B.C.)).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.