Waddams notes, in The Law of Damages, Looseleaf Ed. at 1.2320, that the usual measure of damages for deficiencies in property caused by a party’s breach is the cost of restoration. He also notes, at 1.2450, that the cost of replacement will not be allowed if the owner could have repaired the property at a lesser cost. The onus, however, is on the wrongdoer to show that the expenditure was unreasonable or that a less expensive restoration would have served the purpose: Lodge Holes Colliery v. Wednesbury Corp., [1908] AC 323 (HL) at 325.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.