The real and basic change brought about by the amended s. 11 is that a further party could be added, where no prejudice was shown, even after the limitation period had expired. It is not the kind of conceptual change which was being considered in Perrie v. Martin, supra, but rather a change which permitted the limitation period to be extended in certain cases, which is really nothing more than an amendment dealing with an extension of a limitation period.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.