The following excerpt is from Canada v. Spruce Credit Union, 2014 FCA 143 (CanLII), [2015] 3 FCR 431:
The alleged errors are subject to the standard of review set out in Housen v. Nikolaisen, 2002 SCC 33, [2002] 2 S.C.R. 235 [Housen] . Questions of law are reviewable on a standard of correctness. Questions of fact or mixed fact and law are only reviewable for palpable and overriding error, unless they contain an extricable question of law, in which case a correctness standard applies (Housen at paragraphs 8, 10 and 26).
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.