The following excerpt is from Matos v. Irvin, 104 F.3d 353 (2nd Cir. 1996):
Under Stone v. Powell, 428 U.S. 465, 96 S.Ct. 3037 (1976), a petitioner who has had full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court may not seek subsequent federal review of those claims. We therefore agree with the district court that we may not consider whether petitioners' appellate panel decided their Fourth Amendment claims incorrectly.
Finding no merit in petitioners' remaining contentions, we affirm the decision of the district court.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.