Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Bisel v. United States, CASE NO. 10-CR-5016-17 H, CASE NO. 15-CV-1354 H (S.D. Cal. 2015):
Generally, a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review is barred from raising it on collateral review unless he can show cause and prejudice, or actual innocence. See Bousley v. United States, 523 U.S. 614, 622 (1998);
Page 5
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for denying collateral review because of a petitioner's failure to raise an issue on direct appeal? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does Atwood have to overcome procedural default and procedural failure to raise this claim to the state court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a federal prisoner who fails to raise a claim on direct appeal under section 2255 of the Criminal Code, default on the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a state's failure to make a federal habeas claim barred in federal court by procedural default? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in the state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
What is the test for reviewing a Fourth Amendment claim in circumstances where the petitioner has neither pleaded nor proved the denial of a full and fair opportunity to litigate that claim in state courts? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
