Does Atwood have to overcome procedural default and procedural failure to raise this claim to the state court?
MultiRegion, United States of America
The following excerpt is from Atwood v. Ryan, 870 F.3d 1033 (9th Cir. 2017):
failed to raise this claim to the state court, and that it is procedurally defaulted. Nevertheless, Atwood argues that he has met the requirements set forth in Martinez v. Ryan , 566 U.S. at 910, 132 S.Ct. 1309, to overcome the procedural default. Atwood asserts that the district court erred in rejecting this argument.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek a federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state prisoner has defaulted on his federal claim in a state court pursuant to an independent and adequate state procedural rule, can he seek federal habeas review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
If a federal claim is not "adjudicated on the merits" in a state court, if the state court rejects the federal claim, what is the legal test for review of the claim? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a state's failure to make a federal habeas claim barred in federal court by procedural default? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, can the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a federal habeas court re-examine a state court's determination that a claim raised solely an issue of state law? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
When a state court rejects some claims but does not expressly address a federal claim, must the federal court presume that the federal claim was adjudicated on the merits? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Is a petitioner who has procedurally defaulted by not raising a claim on direct review or collateral review barred from raising it on collateral review? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Can a petitioner who has had a full and fair review of his Fourth Amendment claims in state court seek to have those claims reviewed by the federal appeals court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
Does a habeas petitioner who has defaulted on his federal claims in a state court have to continue to seek relief in a federal court? (MultiRegion, United States of America)
