Does a direction of a trial of a issue under Rule 221 preclude a subsequent trial of outstanding issues remaining to be heard?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Sware v. Welda Estate, 1999 ABQB 79 (CanLII):
In Seward v. Seward Estate (1996) 194 A.R. 346, [A.C.Q.B.], Ritter, J. defined clean hands and certain equitable remedies. Also, here a direction of a trial of an issue under Rule 221 did not preclude a subsequent trial of outstanding issues remaining to be heard.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What is the test for determining whether there is a genuine issue for trial? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of pre-trial publicity on the right to a fair trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a motion for summary judgment a genuine issue requiring a trial? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of custody and custody issues in a motion of motion of the same name? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a statutory scheme directing the equal division of matrimonial property between the spouses of a common law husband and the common law spouse preclude equitable remedy? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a summary trial be held without a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a third party holding the record be compelled to produce the record directly or directly? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the remaining issues of review? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a trial de novo required after a judge who had heard a case has died? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test to determine whether a matter can be heard by way of summary trial? (Alberta, Canada)
