Is a motion for summary judgment a genuine issue requiring a trial?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from Condominium Corporation No 072 8880 v Sully, 2021 ABQB 901 (CanLII):

Hryniak v. Mauldin, supra, states: There will be no genuine issue requiring a trial when the judge is able to reach a fair and just determination on the merits on a motion for summary judgment. This will be the case when the process (1) allows the judge to make the necessary findings of fact, (2) allows the judge to apply the law to the facts, and (3) is a proportionate, more expeditious and less expensive means to achieve a just result.

Other Questions


What is the test for summary judgment in a motion for summary dismissal? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts dealt with the issue of custody and custody issues in a motion of motion of the same name? (Alberta, Canada)
Does a direction of a trial of a issue under Rule 221 preclude a subsequent trial of outstanding issues remaining to be heard? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a stay of execution of a motion for an application for a motion to overturn a motion of appeal? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether there is a genuine issue for trial? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a summary trial be held without a trial judge? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a claim of delay be considered relevant in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the scope of a review of the evidence in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the effect of a clause in a personal injury judgment requiring the payment of interest on principal after judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
How have the courts in the United States and Canada interpreted the principles of the Court of Appeal in the context of a motion for summary judgment? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.