Can a third party holding the record be compelled to produce the record directly or directly?

Alberta, Canada


The following excerpt is from HZ v Unger, 2013 ABQB 639 (CanLII):

Brown v. Malik proceeds on the assumption that the third party holding the record might not be compelled to produce it directly (under old Rule 209, or new Rule 5.13) because of the statutory exemption. The statutory immunity removed the document from the power of an examinee, over whom the court had jurisdiction.

Other Questions


What is the common law procedure for producing records relating to a complainant or witness in the possession of a third party? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
Is there a resulting trust where a non-titled party has contributed directly or indirectly to the acquisition by the title holder of the property or the improvement of such property? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of the trustees of an estate to accept or reject an increased offer from a third party? (Alberta, Canada)
If there is no clear agency between the parties, can the parties be considered fiduciary? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of a third party to provide financial information to a customer in breach of an insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a court bound by law to award costs in favour of the successful party against the unsuccessful party? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a third party claim in a motor vehicle accident? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a third party notice valid after the expiry of the limitation period? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a third party dealing with a corporation not required to ensure that all internal regulations have been complied with where a document is regular on its face? (Alberta, Canada)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.