In Clarke v. Trask (1901), 1 O.L.R. 207 (H.C.J.), Falconbridge C. J. found that a trial de novo was required after a judge who had heard a case and reserved for further consideration passed away before rendering a decision. Although Falconbridge C.J. noted that the easiest manner in which to dispense with the case was to set it down for argument on the evidence already heard, he felt he did not have the power to do so without consent of the parties.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.