What relevant contingencies need to be considered in determining if a plaintiff has been diagnosed with dementia?
British Columbia, Canada
The following excerpt is from Szymanski v. Morin, 2010 BCSC 1 (CanLII):
In terms of relevant contingencies that need to be considered, they may be general or specific in nature. Relevant contingencies can include such things as the potential for improvements in health, opportunities for advancement, as well as the usual chances and hazards of life: Dujic v. Hahn, 2006 BCSC 154 at para. 105; Kuskis at para. 155.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
What factors are considered to be relevant in determining the value of a plaintiff's stock options? (British Columbia, Canada)
What relevant contingencies need to be considered in determining the outcome of a medical malpractice case? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the relevant test for determining whether a plaintiff has a "robust attitude" to a plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors are considered to be a contributory factor in determining whether a plaintiff has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been diagnosed with dementia? (British Columbia, Canada)
What are the relevant factors for determining whether either of two possible jurisdictions would be suitable for the determination of issues raised by the litigation at issue? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors have been added to the list of factors that a plaintiff must consider in determining the severity of a motor vehicle accident? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the test for determining whether a plaintiff has been diagnosed with multiple sclerosis? (British Columbia, Canada)
What is the standard of review applied by the Court of Appeal in determining the apportionment of fault between a plaintiff and plaintiff? (British Columbia, Canada)
What factors will be considered in determining whether a plaintiff would have continued to work, or not? (British Columbia, Canada)
