However, in so doing, he clearly erred in his statement of the applicable law. He referred to the decision of this Court in Wong v. Wong, BCCA 2006 540. He did not deal with the test set out by the majority in that decision. Instead, he referred to a “robust attitude” test proposed by Madam Justice Saunders, who, although she concurred in the result in Wong v. Wong, dissented with respect to the appropriate test.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.