The plaintiffs say to this list must be added the factor that both had been induced to join the defendant and each left employment with competitors who recognized their abilities, though not to the same extent of the defendants as far as the potential value of the stock options was concerned. The plaintiffs rely upon Wallace v. United Grain Growers (1997), 1997 CanLII 332 (SCC), 3 S.C.R. 701.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.