The rule expressly provides that any non-disclosure or inaccuracy must be “material” in order to invoke the rule but does not define what a “material” fact is. In Pazner v. Ontario[2], “material facts” were defined as: “those facts of which the judge hearing the motion may need to be aware in coming to his or her decision, non-disclosure of which may affect the outcome of the motion.” (at p. 134, emphasis mine )
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.