Third, the alleged verbal terms are inconsistent with the written terms of PN#2. This engages the substantive aspects of the parol evidence rule that a collateral oral agreement cannot be established where it is inconsistent with or contradicts the written agreement: Hawrish v. Bank of Montreal, 1969 CanLII 2 at para. 15, [1969] S.C.R. 515. This is because, as explained in Gallen:
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.