On appeal of a denial of a motion to suppress evidence, what is the state of the law with respect to the findings of the trial court?

California, United States of America


The following excerpt is from People v. Walker, A137905 (Cal. App. 2019):

On appeal of a denial of a motion to suppress evidence, we defer to the trial court's findings of fact so long as they are supported by substantial evidence. (People v. Letner and Tobin (2010) 50 Cal.4th 99, 145.) As such, we cannot reweigh evidence, independently resolve conflicts in evidence, or make credibility assessments. Rather, we view the relevant facts in the light most favorable to the trial court's ruling, resolving all

Page 11

conflicts in its favor. (People v. Jenkins (2000) 22 Cal.4th 900, 969.) Further, we independently review only the trial court's application of the law to these facts. (Ibid.) If correct on any relevant theory, the trial court's ruling stands. (Ibid.)

Other Questions


On appeal from a denial of a motion to suppress, what is the standard on appeal from the denial of the suppress motion? (California, United States of America)
Can a defendant appeal against a finding that a motion to suppress evidence was successful because the trial court did not retain the exhibits introduced during the combined preliminary hearing and hearing on the motion? (California, United States of America)
Does a denial of a motion for reconsideration by the appellate court of the Superior Court of Appeal affect the appealability of the denial of the motion to reconsideration? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a finding on a suppression motion, what are the implications of the trial court's ruling on the suppression motion? (California, United States of America)
Does the Attorney General's assertion that a denial of a motion on appeal by defendants on appeal violate their right to appeal against the denial of their motion violate their due process? (California, United States of America)
Can a motion to appeal a postconviction finding that the trial court lacks jurisdiction to hear the motion be appealed? (California, United States of America)
In reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court defer to the factual findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a motion to suppress evidence, does the court have to accept the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
When reviewing a denial of a suppression motion on appeal, how do we review the findings of the trial court? (California, United States of America)
On appeal from the denial of a suppression motion, what presumptions are in favor of the trial court's factual findings? (California, United States of America)
X



Alexi white


"The most advanced legal research software ever built."

Trusted by top litigators from across North America.