California, United States of America
The following excerpt is from People v. CASTANEDA, G042110, No. 08CF0947 (Cal. App. 2010):
Defendant next argues that count three, the substantive crime of actively participating in a street gang, must be stricken as a lesser included offense of count one. The test for a lesser included offense is whether one offense necessarily includes the commission of another. (People v. Pearson (1986) 42 Cal.3d 351, 355.) As the court established in Lamas, it is not possible to commit a violation of subdivision (a)(2)(C) without satisfying all the requirements of section 186.22, subdivision (a). (Lamas, supra, 42 Cal.4th at p. 524.) Therefore, count three is indeed a lesser included offense of count one, and must be reversed.
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.