What is the basis for the argument that if there is a clear breach of a negative covenant then an interim injunction will be summarily awarded?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Domo Gasoline Corporation Ltd. v. St. Albert Trail Properties Inc., 2003 ABQB 649 (CanLII):
The basis for the argument that if there has been a clear breach of a negative covenant then an interim injunction will be summarily awarded likely comes from the 1878 English decision of Doherty v. Allman.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
In what circumstances will a court award costs on an indemnity basis or solicitor-client basis rather than party-party basis? (Alberta, Canada)
In what circumstances will a court award costs on an indemnity basis or even on a solicitor's client basis? (Alberta, Canada)
Does the analysis of the second step of analysis for a breach of a fiduciary duty, or is it likely to be negative or negative? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the consequences of a court awarding a lump sum award of costs in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a party who is not an applicant in a restrictive covenant action against a party that is not a party to the restrictive covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the legal test for refusing to award an award of interest in a personal injury case? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for meeting the condition precedent in the context of an application for an interim injunction against the Minister of Environment? (Alberta, Canada)
Is a general advertisement sufficient to constitute a breach of a non-solicitation covenant? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for breaching a restrictive covenant in a condominium scheme? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for an interim injunction? (Alberta, Canada)
