I also find support for my view that “something more” than a general advertisement is needed to constitute a breach of a non-solicitation covenant in the opinion of Lamer C.J.C. in Committee for the Commonwealth of Canada v. Canada, 1991 CanLII 119 (SCC), [1991] 1 S.C.R. 139 … [where the Chief Justice stated that] it can be seen that the word "sollicitation" necessarily implies a request or invitation. It in fact refers to conduct for the purpose of inciting someone to do something, characterized by some pressing request, commercial or otherwise, in nature.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.