I will deal with each of these points in turn. Firstly, Mr. Justice Slatter in Potts v. McCan [2002] A.J. No. 999, 2002 ABQB 734 stated, in part, at paragraph 35: The law is however clear that the mere discharge of a restrictive covenant from one property in a building scheme, or the breach of the covenant by a few owners, is not sufficient to undermine the entire covenant.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.