Does the analysis of the second step of analysis for a breach of a fiduciary duty, or is it likely to be negative or negative?
Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Neuman v. Parkland County, 2004 ABPC 58 (CanLII):
In Ryan v. Victoria (City), (supra) Major J., at paras. [24] to [26] discussed the second step of the analysis: whether there are any considerations which ought to negative or limit (a) the scope of the duty and (b) the class of persons to whom it is owed or (c) the damages to which a breach of it may give rise.
"The most advanced legal research software ever built."
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.
Other Questions
Can a fiduciary or passive trustee of an estate be sued for loss of funds by a broker who had no knowledge of the breach of fiduciaries duties? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a statement of claim alleging breach of fiduciary duty? (Alberta, Canada)
Is an employee’s duty not to compete during the notice period inconsistent with the law concerning fiduciary duties? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the elements of knowing assistance required for an intermeddler or stranger to the breach of trust or fiduciary duty? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the remedy for a breach of fiduciary duty that tainted with dishonesty? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for a claim of breach of fiduciary duty in an aboriginal dispute? (Alberta, Canada)
Can a breach of trust or fiduciary duty result in the award of solicitor and client costs? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the test for knowingly participating in a breach of duty by a fiduciary who is not a trustee? (Alberta, Canada)
What are the duties of a doctor in the fiduciary relationship with a patient? (Alberta, Canada)
What is the duty of a third party to provide financial information to a customer in breach of an insurance contract? (Alberta, Canada)
