Alberta, Canada
The following excerpt is from Associated Investors of Canada Ltd. (Re), 1996 CanLII 10541 (AB QB):
The court distinguished this case from Bahin v. Hughes (1886), 31 Ch. D. 390 (C.A.), because the two passive trustees in MacDonald were without fault. A was found to be in fraudulent breach of trust and H, a constructive trustee arising out of “knowing assistance” to that breach. The passive trustees were entitled to a joint and several judgment against A and H (page 130).
The above passage should not be considered legal advice. Reliable answers to complex legal questions require comprehensive research memos. To learn more visit www.alexi.com.